Oppty · Contract evidence

← Contract history

OI Formation & Direction

AMZN · Aug 7, 2026 · $275 call AMZN260807C00275000

Two-stage assessment

Confirmed net formation

OI increased by 48 contracts after the source session.

Initiation evidence
Suggestive tape pressure · Bid-led
Underlying implication
Consistent with bearish or neutral call overwriting

Settlement arithmetic

Formation window

Source trade date
July 10, 2026Tape session
Baseline OI
2,843OI visible on source date
Settlement observation
July 13, 2026Next returned trading row
Settled OI
2,891Next observation
OI change
+48Settled minus baseline
Trade-day volume
154Bound denominator
Net-formation ratio
31.17%OI change ÷ volume

Bound-first attribution

Side partitions & lower bounds

Each raw bound is max(0, OI change − (volume − side volume)). A positive value is the minimum net formation forced into that quote-side bucket.

Ask
65Raw lower bound: 0
Bid
69Raw lower bound: 0
Mid
20Raw lower bound: 0
Neutral
0Raw lower bound: 0
Clean ask
0Side volume after allowing all flagged structure to contaminate this bucket
Clean bid
0Side volume after allowing all flagged structure to contaminate this bucket

Conservative allowance

Flagged structure

The clean dominant-side bound allows every flagged contract to contaminate that side. Because flags can overlap, their sum is capped at daily volume.

Multileg
46Flags may overlap
Stock multileg
0Flags may overlap
Cross
0Flags may overlap
Floor
0Flags may overlap
Clamped structure allowance
46Sum capped at total volume

Context only

Intraday corroboration

Minute clustering, premium, and IV describe the tape. They cannot create or increase a mathematical bound.

Active minutes
41Returned minute buckets
Largest minute
3019.48% of daily volume
Ask/bid premium imbalance
-3.70%Positive is ask-premium led
IV range
43.55% – 45.14%Descriptive only
Daily reconciliation
ReconciledMinute side totals versus daily side totals

Interpretation boundaries

What this report cannot verify

Motive and identity remain unknown

These aggregates cannot distinguish speculation, hedging, overwriting, participant capacity, or verified open/close labels.

Conditional dealer mechanics

If a dealer was the counterparty, carried this position without portfolio offsets, and delta-hedged it, the mechanical scenario could require the dealer to sell underlying. This is not verified flow.

Reason codes confirmed_net_formation side_bias_only